Proposed Expansion of Criminal-Record Review for Form I-765
Current status
Comment period closed
In effect?
Not in effect
Community score
Last checked
ET
DHS proposes extending adverse criminal-record discretion standards to most discretionary work-permit applications, including OPT and H-4 EAD. Relevant arrests, criminal charges, indictments or convictions would generally lead to I-765 denial unless significant countervailing public interests apply.
Who is affected
applicants with related criminal records seeking discretionary work authorization, including OPT and H-4 EAD.
Key boundaries
Ordinary civil traffic tickets are not automatically criminal records; the proposal does not automatically revoke existing EADs.
Next to watch
DHS will review comments and decide whether to revise or finalize the rule; no public date is available.
Policy background
00 / BACKGROUND
RIN 1615-AC98 was published on June 5, 2026 and comments closed August 4. The proposal covers most 8 CFR 274a.12(c) categories and includes biometrics for initial and renewal I-765 filings.
Potential impact
01 / IMPACT
OUR TAKE · ANALYSIS
Criminal-record review could affect work authorization and employment start dates.
If finalized, the proposal could require some applicants to explain criminal records and case outcomes more fully. The effect would concentrate on relevant records and covered categories. A higher evidence threshold could separate eligibility to apply from a favorable exercise of discretion.
For people with relevant records: case dispositions matter more
Arrests, criminal charges, and convictions may need separate explanations. The absence of a conviction would not necessarily mean there is no adverse discretionary factor under the proposal.
For example · Hypothetical
Zhang was arrested in a criminal case but not convicted. The proposal treats specified criminal history, including arrest, as a ground for generally denying these work permits absent significant countervailing public interests. If applied to OPT, the lack of a conviction would not by itself remove the approval risk; the issue is possible denial, not merely delay.
For employment transitions: review risk affects timing
If supplemental evidence or more complex individual review is required, preparation and work start dates may become harder to predict. Employers may also need to adjust onboarding.
For other applicants: category and nature of the record are central
The proposal cannot be reduced to a claim that every OPT application will be denied, nor should an ordinary civil traffic ticket automatically be treated as a criminal record. Categories and facts require separate analysis.
For example · Hypothetical
Chen previously received a work permit but has criminal history covered by the proposal. If the new standard governs renewal, the agency would assess that application under the new standard rather than issue a card automatically because an earlier one was approved. A denial could prevent continued work through that category after the existing permission ends.
Outlook
02 / OUTLOOK
Our outlook: the final definitions of relevant criminal conduct, public-interest exceptions, and evidence requirements will explain the practical effect better than a general statement about tougher review. Clear boundaries would also affect consistency in adjudication.
What happens in each case?
Choose a situation below to see its possible effects. These are alternatives, not steps or predictions of likelihood.
IF THIS HAPPENS A · Broad application as proposed
Applicants with relevant records face a higher burden of explanation
Assumption: Most discretionary employment-authorization categories become subject to the new adverse discretionary standard.
Potential effects in this scenario
The nature of a record and its case documents would matter more, potentially raising filing risk and preparation costs for some people.
Signals to watch
Final covered categories, standards for adverse factors, and public-interest exceptions.
These scenarios are our analysis, not probability rankings. We revise them as evidence changes.
Which boundaries could change this analysis?
Covered categories
Most categories under 8 CFR 274a.12(c), including OPT and H-4 EAD.
Nature of records
Criminal conduct and records require specific analysis and should not be generalized to every civil traffic ticket.
Existing cards
The proposal would not automatically revoke an issued EAD; future renewal standards require separate analysis.
Progress
03 / Federal rulemaking
DHS published the NPRM and the public comment period closed on August 4, 2026. There is no final rule or effective date.
Currently waiting for
DHS review of comments and a decision on revisions or a final rule; no date is set.
Last completed · Public comment
The public submits comments and the agency reviews them. Closing comments does not make the rule effective.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Distribution of views
200 sampled comments
Published comments: 4,804 · Sampled 09/12/2026, 09:09 ET
Comment period closed 2026-08-04 · Sample retained for review
This sample covers comments on the full proposed rule, including criminal-record review and work authorization for parole, deferred action and supervision orders. Labels describe the related work-authorization policy direction; clear calls to preserve, restore or facilitate lawful work count as opposition to tightening.
Policy direction
Classified by policy direction: support includes endorsing the proposal, clearly negative views of the relevant foreign-worker or visa program, and calls for tighter restrictions. Opposition includes rejecting restrictions, defending migrants or work authorization, and preserving or expanding access. Explicit views on the proposal’s exact provisions are not required.
Oppose tightening195 / 200 · 97.5%
Support tightening1 / 200 · 0.5%
Conditional / mixed direction0 / 200 · 0%
Unclear / unclassifiable direction4 / 200 · 2%
Themes discussed
Supporters and opponents may discuss the same theme. A comment can have multiple labels; percentages use the selected group’s comment count, so totals may exceed 100%.
All: 200 comments · Percentages within this group
Livelihood and self-sufficiency172 / 200 · 86%
Employers, taxes and economic contributions113 / 200 · 56.5%
Renewals, backlogs and work continuity99 / 200 · 49.5%
Humanitarian protection and safe return89 / 200 · 44.5%
Discretion, procedure and reliance interests71 / 200 · 35.5%
E-Verify and self-employment barriers46 / 200 · 23%
Arrest records and individual assessment20 / 200 · 10%
Protection for crime victims4 / 200 · 2%
Sampling method & all 200 records
A fixed random seed selected 200 unique comment IDs from the complete listing of 4804 published records. Sampled 09/12/2026, 09:09 ET. This site's AI classified each body into one position and zero or more themes; these are not official labels. Similar submissions with distinct IDs remain separate records.
Each full body is reviewed for its relevant policy direction, rather than classified by isolated words such as support or oppose. Demands for higher fees, tighter restrictions or visa abolition count as support for tightening; preserving or expanding work and residence opportunities counts as opposition. Scope-dependent combinations of tightening and easing, or explicit substantive conditions of support, remain conditional / mixed. Opposing the removal of protections while accepting shorter protections only as a fallback remains opposition. General anti-fraud language does not override an overall defense of lawful work access. Unrelated content, pure questions, indeterminate views and unreadable records remain unclear. Labels rely on the text, not names or identities. Unavailable attachments are disclosed and only readable bodies are assessed. No sample is replaced because of its viewpoint or readability.
Work authorization effects on housing, healthcare, household income and reliance on assistance.
Employers, taxes and economic contributions
Effects on staffing, business operations, taxes and local economies.
Humanitarian protection and safe return
Safety and protection commitments for Ukrainian, Afghan and other protected populations.
Renewals, backlogs and work continuity
Processing times, annual renewals, fees, transitions and exemptions.
E-Verify and self-employment barriers
Employer verification requirements affecting small businesses, self-employment and jobs.
Arrest records and individual assessment
Non-conviction records, rehabilitation and fairness of criminal-history presumptions.
Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
Discretionary standards, review, biometrics, administrative-law arguments and reliance interests.
Protection for crime victims
U-visa waits, deferred action, work authorization and cooperation in reporting crime.
All: 200 comments
USCIS-2026-0067-1381 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges reconsideration and preservation of work authorization for compliant parolees to prevent family hardship during backlogs.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0535 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-4483 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests work authorization to contribute economically, pay taxes and become self-sufficient; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-1050 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls the proposal unnecessary and discriminatory, arguing it harms people without charges and undermines economic contributions.Arrest records and individual assessment · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0408 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2372 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests timely permits and gap-free renewals to prevent job loss; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4725 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks to protect lawful work authorization and avoid new barriers while addressing processing delays and work interruptions.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4663 ↗Oppose tightening · The organization explicitly strongly opposes the proposal in its body text, with detailed reasons in an attachment.Official attachment downloads were attempted and returned HTTP 403; classification uses readable body text only, and attachment contents were not verified.
USCIS-2026-0067-0996 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of restrictions and protection of family livelihoods through reduced backlogs and simpler work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-1217 ↗Oppose tightening · Warns that job loss would leave the family without means to live, favoring preservation of employment and household income.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3378 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for protecting authorization for compliant families to keep working, emphasizing household stability and tax contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2541 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks against new employment barriers and seeks preserved and expanded automatic extensions and longer validity to protect households and businesses.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3482 ↗Unclear / unclassifiable direction · The body only refers to an attachment and does not establish a proposal stance.Official attachment downloads were attempted and returned HTTP 403; classification uses readable body text only, and attachment contents were not verified.
USCIS-2026-0067-4316 ↗Oppose tightening · Describes job loss and hardship from renewal delays and seeks continued work; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1680 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests timely Ukrainian parole, TPS and work permit renewals; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3130 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal and expanded work authorization for parole, deferred action and supervision-order populations, opposing discretionary barriers and shorter validity.Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4814 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for withdrawal, arguing added restrictions lack public-safety benefits and harm protected people’s livelihoods and employers.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2497 ↗Oppose tightening · Describes refuge from war and the importance of lawful work to self-sufficiency; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-1164 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes the proposal and seeks to retain humanitarian parolees’ work authorization for self-sufficiency and tax contributions.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3234 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of restrictions and reduced backlogs and simpler work permits to protect family livelihoods.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3645 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for preserving and expanding lawful work opportunities, opposing the harm restrictions cause families, businesses and communities.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3195 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0797 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0641 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2453 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal, opposing denial presumptions based on arrests without convictions and lack of review; exemptions are only a fallback request.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-1247 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks to cancel the ban on automatic work permit extensions, citing job loss and living-cost pressures despite timely filing.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0724 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2147 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks against work permit restrictions, arguing they undermine family self-sufficiency and increase assistance needs.Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2001 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks against added barriers to lawful work, emphasizing war-displaced people’s self-sufficiency, taxes and economic contributions.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0465 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2375 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes denial of work authorization during green-card waits over resolved minor records, emphasizing family hardship and loss of stable employment.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0727 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-3508 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes broad restrictions and seeks to preserve individualized consideration of minor old offenses, rehabilitation and overall circumstances.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1941 ↗Oppose tightening · Praises Ukrainians’ work contributions and supports their right to work; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0679 ↗Oppose tightening · Says the proposal violates war-displaced people’s rights, emphasizing safety, work and tax contributions.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4601 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges full withdrawal, arguing annual renewals and record restrictions undermine U-visa victim protection.Protection for crime victims · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0553 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-1522 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks timely work permits to reduce household and employment hardship; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4119 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for protecting lawful work authorization and avoiding new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2561 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for protecting humanitarian parolees’ work authorization and continuous access to prevent backlog-related household harm.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Humanitarian protection and safe return
USCIS-2026-0067-4285 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for protecting lawful work authorization and avoiding new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4218 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0843 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes the proposal and restrictions based on uncharged arrests, arguing they violate rights and harm families and businesses.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3900 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks reliable work authorization for Ukrainian parolees, citing livelihood harm from short validity and policy uncertainty.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4470 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for protecting lawful work authorization and avoiding new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2013 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks timely work permits to reduce household and employment hardship; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4630 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes denial presumptions based on arrests without convictions and seeks individualized review and procedural fairness.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3393 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-3679 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for protecting lawful work authorization and avoiding new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2731 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for protecting lawful access to work authorization.
USCIS-2026-0067-0752 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2404 ↗Oppose tightening · Emphasizes work authorization for housing, healthcare and family independence; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4602 ↗Oppose tightening · The body explicitly states opposition to the proposal, with detailed comments in an attachment.Official attachment downloads were attempted and returned HTTP 403; classification uses readable body text only, and attachment contents were not verified.
USCIS-2026-0067-2642 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks timely work permits to reduce household and employment hardship; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4571 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of U-visa work permit restrictions, opposing annual renewal, economic-necessity and employer-verification barriers.Protection for crime victims · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-1517 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks timely work permits to reduce household and employment hardship; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0083 ↗Oppose tightening · Supports lawful work for people legally in the United States, favoring preservation of work access.
USCIS-2026-0067-2032 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests action on a delayed work permit application; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuityOfficial attachment downloads were attempted and returned HTTP 403; classification uses readable body text only, and attachment contents were not verified.
USCIS-2026-0067-4620 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes denial presumptions based on arrests without convictions and seeks individualized review and procedural fairness.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2471 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for protecting lawful work authorization and avoiding new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3937 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes restrictions on humanitarian parolees’ work and seeks preserved protection and family stability.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3698 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work and no new barriers, emphasizing family and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4645 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes requiring proof of the need to work, arguing it creates livelihood hardship for people seeking refuge.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2379 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes denial presumptions from non-conviction records and seeks individualized assessment and respect for reliance interests.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4234 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for protecting lawful work authorization and avoiding added barriers, citing family self-sufficiency and benefits to employers and the economy.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4684 ↗Oppose tightening · Fears permit expiration will harm family and employment, favoring continued work access.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2505 ↗Oppose tightening · Wants continued work and relief from permit and status renewal difficulties; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity
USCIS-2026-0067-0275 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work and no new barriers, emphasizing family and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0056 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes restrictions on humanitarian parolees’ work and seeks preserved protection and family stability.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4804 ↗Oppose tightening · Argues E-Verify and a uniform discretion framework violate victim confidentiality and seeks reconsideration or exclusion of U-visa applicants.Protection for crime victims · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2809 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-1718 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests relief from processing backlogs and interrupted work; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4454 ↗Oppose tightening · Emphasizes the human and economic harms of limiting lawful employment and favors work access and family stability.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0830 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes permit restrictions and non-conviction arrest presumptions, citing due process and economic harm.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3640 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work and no new barriers, emphasizing family and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2107 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks preserved work permits for humanitarian parolees, arguing restrictions undermine self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Humanitarian protection and safe return
USCIS-2026-0067-0957 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes restrictions on humanitarian parolees’ work and seeks preserved protection and family stability.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3946 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work and no new barriers, emphasizing family and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4779 ↗Oppose tightening · Defends immigrants’ contributions to disability care and asks discretion to consider circumstances they fled, favoring migrant work access.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Humanitarian protection and safe return
USCIS-2026-0067-1329 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges immediate restoration of Ukrainian work permits so people can remain employed and self-sufficient during the war.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity
USCIS-2026-0067-3811 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes heavier requirements and procedures and seeks fair, accessible humanitarian work authorization.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3833 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work and no new barriers, emphasizing family and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1070 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes the proposal, arguing work permit losses harm community sustainability.Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1998 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests relief from processing backlogs and interrupted work; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2892 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work and no new barriers, emphasizing family and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0638 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-3722 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes restrictions on humanitarian parolees’ work and seeks preserved protection and family stability.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-0538 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-1833 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests relief from processing backlogs and interrupted work; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3742 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work and no new barriers, emphasizing family and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1653 ↗Oppose tightening · Emphasizes work as essential to household survival; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2413 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes added economic-necessity, discretion and employer-verification barriers and seeks preserved work for humanitarian parolees.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3259 ↗Oppose tightening · Emphasizes work as essential to household survival; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2803 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0857 ↗Oppose tightening · Supports work opportunities and fair hearings; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-3562 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work authorization without new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0566 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks reasonable work authorization access and no unnecessary delays or barriers from new procedures.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2617 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks that changes not make continued work harder for compliant people with humanitarian protection.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3077 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2241 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal, opposing non-conviction presumptions and universal biometrics burdens, with exemptions as fallback.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity
USCIS-2026-0067-0039 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks fair access and longer permit validity, arguing restrictions harm families and businesses.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3336 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work authorization without new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2554 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks access without new discretionary barriers, E-Verify exemption and continued permits during re-parole waits.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1071 ↗Oppose tightening · Criticizes restrictions as punishing compliant people and creating financial crises, and seeks protected work rights.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1439 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests transparent processing timelines and fee relief; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-1114 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work authorization without new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3464 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work authorization without new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1707 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks reconsideration of work restrictions, arguing they increase poverty, unauthorized employment and business losses.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity
USCIS-2026-0067-3605 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work authorization without new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0856 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes the proposal, calling arrest-record restrictions unfair and harmful to households and the economy.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0227 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks preserved lawful work access to sustain war-affected families’ independence.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2322 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of restrictions on supervision orders, deferred action and parole, citing reliance interests and economic and administrative costs.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers
USCIS-2026-0067-2038 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes added economic-necessity, discretion and employer-verification barriers and seeks preserved work for humanitarian parolees.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1219 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes making work permits harder to obtain, emphasizing lawful workers’ economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1049 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-1573 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks timely work permits to reduce household and employment hardship; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2093 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for rejecting the action, describing affected people as established contributors to society.Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4431 ↗Oppose tightening · Argues threatening permits over arrests without convictions unfairly punishes compliant people and disregards reliance.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3926 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work authorization without new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1337 ↗Oppose tightening · Describes job loss and household pressure from processing delays; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4567 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of humanitarian parole work restrictions, opposing economic necessity, E-Verify and frequent renewals.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0661 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-3678 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work permits without added barriers burdening families and the economy.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1111 ↗Oppose tightening · Condemns treatment of the immigrant community as wrong, directionally opposing restrictions on immigrants.
USCIS-2026-0067-1888 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks a fair and practical permit process so lawfully present people can remain self-sufficient.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3477 ↗Oppose tightening · Emphasizes the importance of safe residence and the right to work for the family, favoring preservation of those opportunities.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2137 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks continued work permit eligibility for Ukrainian parolees, emphasizing employers and community impacts.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributionsOfficial attachment downloads were attempted and returned HTTP 403; classification uses readable body text only, and attachment contents were not verified.
USCIS-2026-0067-1928 ↗Oppose tightening · Criticizes the decision as creating unemployment and poverty and losing tax revenue.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-0616 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-1465 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks timely Ukrainian work permit renewals; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributionsOfficial attachment downloads were attempted and returned HTTP 403; classification uses readable body text only, and attachment contents were not verified.
USCIS-2026-0067-4757 ↗Oppose tightening · Warns new requirements worsen delays and hardship and seeks accessible humanitarian work permits.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4377 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work permits without added barriers burdening families and the economy.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1758 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks reconsideration of restrictions, arguing short and uncertain permits impede hiring and career development.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2243 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes the proposal and calls for equal and humane treatment.
USCIS-2026-0067-1624 ↗Oppose tightening · Describes household financial hardship from a prolonged inability to work legally and asks for faster EAD processing.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-1305 ↗Oppose tightening · Warns that EAD delays threaten imminent job loss and family income, favoring continued lawful work access.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4137 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work permits without added barriers burdening families and the economy.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3519 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks for continued work authorization for Ukrainians.Humanitarian protection and safe return
USCIS-2026-0067-1914 ↗Oppose tightening · Describes benefits of employment and taxes; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3756 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work permits without added barriers burdening families and the economy.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3437 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal and fewer backlogs, opposing old records continuing to affect employment.Arrest records and individual assessment · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2949 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges full withdrawal, opposing discretion, automatic termination, employer verification and arrest-record barriers.Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Arrest records and individual assessment · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-0476 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks no new lawful-employment barriers, emphasizing self-sufficient households’ taxes and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3970 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks relief from existing renewal backlogs and work interruptions; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2661 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks relief from existing renewal backlogs and work interruptions; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1266 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal or major revision, arguing restrictions harm the economy, worsen backlogs and weaken due process.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-0239 ↗Oppose tightening · Fears the proposal undermines household employment and seeks preserved work opportunities for humanitarian parolees.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2014 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes added discretion, economic-need and job-offer barriers and seeks reliable work permits.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3972 ↗Unclear / unclassifiable direction · The body only refers to an attachment and does not establish a stance.Official attachment downloads were attempted and returned HTTP 403; classification uses readable body text only, and attachment contents were not verified.
USCIS-2026-0067-4781 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes the proposal, arguing economic necessity and E-Verify undermine compliant parolees’ self-sufficiency.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-1818 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks relief from existing renewal backlogs and work interruptions; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1273 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks against adoption, arguing the proposal adds household stress and harms community employment.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Humanitarian protection and safe return
USCIS-2026-0067-3155 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal, arguing the proposal lacks reasoned justification and ignores DACA-related reliance interests.Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0943 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2780 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges full withdrawal, citing commitments to Afghan allies, reliance interests and renewal barriers.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3051 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-3431 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes rigid criminal-history restrictions and seeks consideration of rehabilitation, completed sentences and individual circumstances.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-1683 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests timely Ukrainian parole, TPS and work permit renewals; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0689 ↗Oppose tightening · Criticizes added arbitrary discretion and processing complexity as harmful to immigrant households and the economy.Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-0081 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes the proposal, arguing lawful work supports labor demand, self-sufficiency and humanitarian protection.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Humanitarian protection and safe return
USCIS-2026-0067-3181 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0611 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges full withdrawal, emphasizing commitments to Afghan allies, reliance interests and employment restrictions.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4525 ↗Unclear / unclassifiable direction · The body only refers to an attachment and does not establish a stance.Official attachment downloads were attempted and returned HTTP 403; classification uses readable body text only, and attachment contents were not verified.
USCIS-2026-0067-3218 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected continued work for timely filers and criticizes permit loss caused by government backlogs.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2964 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges full withdrawal, emphasizing commitments to Afghan allies, reliance interests and employment restrictions.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3139 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected work rights and streamlined renewal, warning barriers harm household housing and employers.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0478 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks preserved lawful employment access without new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic benefits.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1306 ↗Oppose tightening · Describes TPS, parole and work permit backlogs; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity
USCIS-2026-0067-2861 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks preserved lawful employment access without new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic benefits.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1287 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes restrictions and delays from the proposal and seeks predictable processing for household stability.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4575 ↗Oppose tightening · Argues restrictions undermine U-visa purposes and crime-reporting cooperation, suggesting renewable four-year permits.Protection for crime victims · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2724 ↗Unclear / unclassifiable direction · Only confirms a form and provides no stance.
USCIS-2026-0067-3205 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks preserved lawful employment access without new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic benefits.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3024 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal or major revision, opposing one-year validity, E-Verify and arrest-record restrictions.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Arrest records and individual assessment · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4791 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks not to proceed, arguing the proposal creates additional individual difficulties.
USCIS-2026-0067-0885 ↗Support tightening · Explicitly supports the proposal, arguing foreign workers increase competition for domestic jobs.Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2946 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks preserved reliable work permits, arguing restrictions harm compliant households and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0732 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2778 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-1039 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2641 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks preserved reliable work permits, arguing restrictions harm compliant households and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4775 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for rejecting rules that limit or delay permits, emphasizing employer and community needs.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2635 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks preserved reliable work permits, arguing restrictions harm compliant households and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0332 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal or major revision, arguing protection must include lawful work needed for subsistence.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1974 ↗Oppose tightening · Favors protecting compliant parolees and employers from unnecessary burdens; accepts scrutiny of serious crime but overall favors preserving work access.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-0013 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes an economic-necessity barrier as penalizing savings and independence and seeks withdrawal, with a savings exemption as fallback.Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3905 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests timely Ukrainian work permit renewals; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2401 ↗Oppose tightening · Explains how a permit would support entrepreneurship and self-sufficiency; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-1806 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks preserved work opportunities for humanitarian parolees, arguing restrictions harm families and employers.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4451 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks not to complicate work permit procedures, to protect livelihoods and continued tax contributions.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4357 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks withdrawal of permit denials based on arrests and unproven charges, citing presumed innocence and livelihoods.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2664 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks against restricting humanitarian entrants’ work, emphasizing taxes, independence and refuge from war.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0606 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-1847 ↗Oppose tightening · Emphasizes taxes, staffing and reduced assistance from lawful work; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-0585 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-4746 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work permits without new barriers, emphasizing family independence during war.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4049 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes restrictions and seeks E-Verify exemptions, automatic extensions and removal of duplicative economic-need documentation.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0531 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0790 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0636 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
This describes the sample, not public opinion or the probability of a final rule. Posted submissions are self-selected and may include coordinated campaigns.
Distribution of views
Published comments: 4,804 · Sampled 09/12/2026, 09:09 ET
Comment period closed 2026-08-04 · Sample retained for review
This sample covers comments on the full proposed rule, including criminal-record review and work authorization for parole, deferred action and supervision orders. Labels describe the related work-authorization policy direction; clear calls to preserve, restore or facilitate lawful work count as opposition to tightening.
Policy direction
Classified by policy direction: support includes endorsing the proposal, clearly negative views of the relevant foreign-worker or visa program, and calls for tighter restrictions. Opposition includes rejecting restrictions, defending migrants or work authorization, and preserving or expanding access. Explicit views on the proposal’s exact provisions are not required.
Themes discussed
Supporters and opponents may discuss the same theme. A comment can have multiple labels; percentages use the selected group’s comment count, so totals may exceed 100%.
All: 200 comments · Percentages within this group
Sampling method & all 200 records
A fixed random seed selected 200 unique comment IDs from the complete listing of 4804 published records. Sampled 09/12/2026, 09:09 ET. This site's AI classified each body into one position and zero or more themes; these are not official labels. Similar submissions with distinct IDs remain separate records.
Each full body is reviewed for its relevant policy direction, rather than classified by isolated words such as support or oppose. Demands for higher fees, tighter restrictions or visa abolition count as support for tightening; preserving or expanding work and residence opportunities counts as opposition. Scope-dependent combinations of tightening and easing, or explicit substantive conditions of support, remain conditional / mixed. Opposing the removal of protections while accepting shorter protections only as a fallback remains opposition. General anti-fraud language does not override an overall defense of lawful work access. Unrelated content, pure questions, indeterminate views and unreadable records remain unclear. Labels rely on the text, not names or identities. Unavailable attachments are disclosed and only readable bodies are assessed. No sample is replaced because of its viewpoint or readability.
Download sampling frame, seed & classifications (JSON)All: 200 comments
This describes the sample, not public opinion or the probability of a final rule. Posted submissions are self-selected and may include coordinated campaigns.
Read published comments on Regulations.gov ↗