Proposed Expansion of Criminal-Record Review for Form I-765
Current status
Comment period closed
In effect?
Not in effect
Community score
Last checked
ET
Many work permits, including OPT and H-4 EAD, are legally ones USCIS may grant or deny at its discretion. DHS plans to add a clear standard to that discretion: if the applicant has an arrest, criminal charge, indictment or conviction, the I-765 would generally be denied unless there is a strong public-interest reason. The proposal came out in June 2026, comments closed August 4, and DHS has not issued a final rule.
Who is affected
People with a criminal record who apply for work permits such as OPT or H-4 EAD. A criminal record here includes an arrest that never led to a conviction.
Keep in mind
Ordinary civil traffic tickets (such as speeding or parking fines) are not criminal records, and EADs already issued stay valid.
Next to watch
Date unknown · DHS reviews public comments and decides whether to revise or finalize.
Policy background
00 / BACKGROUND
The proposal, RIN 1615-AC98, cleared OIRA review on March 31, 2026, was published June 5, and its 60-day comment period closed August 4.
It covers most work-permit categories under the federal regulation at 8 CFR 274a.12(c). What the (c) categories have in common is that you apply to USCIS and it decides at its discretion; OPT and H-4 EAD are both in this group. The proposal also requires biometrics, meaning fingerprints and a photo taken at a USCIS appointment, for both first-time and renewal I-765s.
The proposal lists four kinds of record, from lightest to heaviest: an arrest (taken in by police), a criminal charge (prosecutors file an accusation), an indictment (formally sent to criminal trial) and a conviction (found guilty by a court). Under the proposal, even the first could be a reason to deny.
Potential impact
01 / IMPACT
OUR TAKE · ANALYSIS
A criminal record could mean a denied work permit and a delayed start date.
If adopted, applicants with a record would need to explain what happened and how the case ended (dismissed, acquitted or convicted), ideally with court documents. Without complete paperwork, the application could be denied or take a long time. The effect falls on people with records; OPT applications without one are reviewed as usual.
For people with a record: proof of how the case ended matters more
Arrests, charges and convictions may each need explaining. Under the proposal, even an arrest without a conviction could be a reason to deny.
For example · Hypothetical
Zhang was once arrested in a criminal case but not convicted. The proposal lists arrests as a general reason to deny these work permits unless there is a strong public-interest reason. Applied to his OPT application, that record alone could lead to a denial, not just a delay.
For start dates: harder to predict
If more evidence or case-by-case review is needed, it gets harder to say when the permit comes through and when you can start, and employers have to adjust.
For people without a criminal record: business as usual
The proposal targets people with criminal records. OPT applications without one are reviewed as usual, and ordinary civil tickets are not criminal records.
For example · Hypothetical
Chen has had a work permit before but has a criminal record of the kind the proposal lists. If the new standard applies to his next renewal, USCIS would decide under it instead of approving because he was approved before. If the renewal is denied, he could not keep working on that card after it expires.
Outlook
02 / OUTLOOK
Our view: what matters is how the final rule defines three things: which records count, what exceptions exist and what proof is required. The clearer those are, the more consistent decisions will be from office to office.
What happens in each case?
Pick a situation to see what it would mean for you. The three are side-by-side possibilities, in no particular order.
IF THIS HAPPENS A · Broad application as proposed
Applicants with records have more to prove
Assumption: The new denial standard applies to most work-permit categories.
Potential effects in this scenario
The kind of record and the case documents matter more; some people face higher denial risk and more preparation.
Signals to watch
Which categories the final rule covers, which records count and what public-interest exceptions exist.
These scenarios are our analysis and get updated as new documents come out.
What would change this analysis?
Which work permits
Most categories under 8 CFR 274a.12(c), including OPT and H-4 EAD.
Which records
Arrests, criminal charges, indictments and convictions; ordinary civil traffic tickets are not included.
Cards you already have
Issued EADs stay valid; renewals would be judged under the final rule’s standard.
Progress
03 / Federal rulemaking
The proposal is out and comments closed August 4, 2026. The next step is a final rule from DHS.
Currently waiting for
DHS’s review of public comments and its decision to revise or finalize.
Last completed · Public comment
Anyone can comment before the deadline, and the agency must read and respond. Current rules still apply after this step.
PUBLIC COMMENTS
Distribution of views
200 sampled comments
Published comments: 4,804 · Sampled 09/12/2026, 09:09 ET
Comment period closed 2026-08-04 · Sample retained for review
This sample covers comments on the full proposed rule, including criminal-record review and work authorization for parole, deferred action and supervision orders. Labels describe the related work-authorization policy direction; clear calls to preserve, restore or facilitate lawful work count as opposition to tightening.
Policy direction
Classified by policy direction: support includes endorsing the proposal, clearly negative views of the relevant foreign-worker or visa program, and calls for tighter restrictions. Opposition includes rejecting restrictions, defending migrants or work authorization, and preserving or expanding access. Explicit views on the proposal’s exact provisions are not required.
Oppose tightening195 / 200 · 97.5%
Support tightening1 / 200 · 0.5%
Conditional / mixed direction0 / 200 · 0%
Unclear / unclassifiable direction4 / 200 · 2%
Themes discussed
Supporters and opponents may discuss the same theme. A comment can have multiple labels; percentages use the selected group’s comment count, so totals may exceed 100%.
All: 200 comments · Percentages within this group
Livelihood and self-sufficiency172 / 200 · 86%
Employers, taxes and economic contributions113 / 200 · 56.5%
Renewals, backlogs and work continuity99 / 200 · 49.5%
Humanitarian protection and safe return89 / 200 · 44.5%
Discretion, procedure and reliance interests71 / 200 · 35.5%
E-Verify and self-employment barriers46 / 200 · 23%
Arrest records and individual assessment20 / 200 · 10%
Protection for crime victims4 / 200 · 2%
Sampling method & all 200 records
A fixed random seed selected 200 unique comment IDs from the complete listing of 4804 published records. Sampled 09/12/2026, 09:09 ET. This site's AI classified each body into one position and zero or more themes; these are not official labels. Similar submissions with distinct IDs remain separate records.
Each full body is reviewed for its relevant policy direction, rather than classified by isolated words such as support or oppose. Demands for higher fees, tighter restrictions or visa abolition count as support for tightening; preserving or expanding work and residence opportunities counts as opposition. Scope-dependent combinations of tightening and easing, or explicit substantive conditions of support, remain conditional / mixed. Opposing the removal of protections while accepting shorter protections only as a fallback remains opposition. General anti-fraud language does not override an overall defense of lawful work access. Unrelated content, pure questions, indeterminate views and unreadable records remain unclear. Labels rely on the text, not names or identities. Unavailable attachments are disclosed and only readable bodies are assessed. No sample is replaced because of its viewpoint or readability.
Work authorization effects on housing, healthcare, household income and reliance on assistance.
Employers, taxes and economic contributions
Effects on staffing, business operations, taxes and local economies.
Humanitarian protection and safe return
Safety and protection commitments for Ukrainian, Afghan and other protected populations.
Renewals, backlogs and work continuity
Processing times, annual renewals, fees, transitions and exemptions.
E-Verify and self-employment barriers
Employer verification requirements affecting small businesses, self-employment and jobs.
Arrest records and individual assessment
Non-conviction records, rehabilitation and fairness of criminal-history presumptions.
Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
Discretionary standards, review, biometrics, administrative-law arguments and reliance interests.
Protection for crime victims
U-visa waits, deferred action, work authorization and cooperation in reporting crime.
All: 200 comments
USCIS-2026-0067-1381 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges reconsideration and preservation of work authorization for compliant parolees to prevent family hardship during backlogs.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0535 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-4483 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests work authorization to contribute economically, pay taxes and become self-sufficient; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-1050 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls the proposal unnecessary and discriminatory, arguing it harms people without charges and undermines economic contributions.Arrest records and individual assessment · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0408 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2372 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests timely permits and gap-free renewals to prevent job loss; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4725 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks to protect lawful work authorization and avoid new barriers while addressing processing delays and work interruptions.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4663 ↗Oppose tightening · The organization explicitly strongly opposes the proposal in its body text, with detailed reasons in an attachment.Attachments couldn’t be downloaded; classified from the comment text.
USCIS-2026-0067-0996 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of restrictions and protection of family livelihoods through reduced backlogs and simpler work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-1217 ↗Oppose tightening · Warns that job loss would leave the family without means to live, favoring preservation of employment and household income.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3378 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for protecting authorization for compliant families to keep working, emphasizing household stability and tax contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2541 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks against new employment barriers and seeks preserved and expanded automatic extensions and longer validity to protect households and businesses.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3482 ↗Unclear / unclassifiable direction · The text only says “see attachment,” so no position can be read.Attachments couldn’t be downloaded; classified from the comment text.
USCIS-2026-0067-4316 ↗Oppose tightening · Describes job loss and hardship from renewal delays and seeks continued work; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1680 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests timely Ukrainian parole, TPS and work permit renewals; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3130 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal and expanded work authorization for parole, deferred action and supervision-order populations, opposing discretionary barriers and shorter validity.Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4814 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for withdrawal, arguing added restrictions lack public-safety benefits and harm protected people’s livelihoods and employers.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2497 ↗Oppose tightening · Describes refuge from war and the importance of lawful work to self-sufficiency; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-1164 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes the proposal and seeks to retain humanitarian parolees’ work authorization for self-sufficiency and tax contributions.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3234 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of restrictions and reduced backlogs and simpler work permits to protect family livelihoods.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3645 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for preserving and expanding lawful work opportunities, opposing the harm restrictions cause families, businesses and communities.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3195 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0797 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0641 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2453 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal, opposing denial presumptions based on arrests without convictions and lack of review; exemptions are only a fallback request.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-1247 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks to cancel the ban on automatic work permit extensions, citing job loss and living-cost pressures despite timely filing.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0724 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2147 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks against work permit restrictions, arguing they undermine family self-sufficiency and increase assistance needs.Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2001 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks against added barriers to lawful work, emphasizing war-displaced people’s self-sufficiency, taxes and economic contributions.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0465 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2375 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes denial of work authorization during green-card waits over resolved minor records, emphasizing family hardship and loss of stable employment.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0727 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-3508 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes broad restrictions and seeks to preserve individualized consideration of minor old offenses, rehabilitation and overall circumstances.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1941 ↗Oppose tightening · Praises Ukrainians’ work contributions and supports their right to work; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0679 ↗Oppose tightening · Says the proposal violates war-displaced people’s rights, emphasizing safety, work and tax contributions.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4601 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges full withdrawal, arguing annual renewals and record restrictions undermine U-visa victim protection.Protection for crime victims · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0553 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-1522 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks timely work permits to reduce household and employment hardship; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4119 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for protecting lawful work authorization and avoiding new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2561 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for protecting humanitarian parolees’ work authorization and continuous access to prevent backlog-related household harm.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Humanitarian protection and safe return
USCIS-2026-0067-4285 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for protecting lawful work authorization and avoiding new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4218 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0843 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes the proposal and restrictions based on uncharged arrests, arguing they violate rights and harm families and businesses.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3900 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks reliable work authorization for Ukrainian parolees, citing livelihood harm from short validity and policy uncertainty.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4470 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for protecting lawful work authorization and avoiding new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2013 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks timely work permits to reduce household and employment hardship; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4630 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes denial presumptions based on arrests without convictions and seeks individualized review and procedural fairness.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3393 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-3679 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for protecting lawful work authorization and avoiding new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2731 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for protecting lawful access to work authorization.
USCIS-2026-0067-0752 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2404 ↗Oppose tightening · Emphasizes work authorization for housing, healthcare and family independence; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4602 ↗Oppose tightening · The body explicitly states opposition to the proposal, with detailed comments in an attachment.Attachments couldn’t be downloaded; classified from the comment text.
USCIS-2026-0067-2642 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks timely work permits to reduce household and employment hardship; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4571 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of U-visa work permit restrictions, opposing annual renewal, economic-necessity and employer-verification barriers.Protection for crime victims · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-1517 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks timely work permits to reduce household and employment hardship; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0083 ↗Oppose tightening · Supports lawful work for people legally in the United States, favoring preservation of work access.
USCIS-2026-0067-2032 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests action on a delayed work permit application; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuityAttachments couldn’t be downloaded; classified from the comment text.
USCIS-2026-0067-4620 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes denial presumptions based on arrests without convictions and seeks individualized review and procedural fairness.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2471 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for protecting lawful work authorization and avoiding new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3937 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes restrictions on humanitarian parolees’ work and seeks preserved protection and family stability.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3698 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work and no new barriers, emphasizing family and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4645 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes requiring proof of the need to work, arguing it creates livelihood hardship for people seeking refuge.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2379 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes denial presumptions from non-conviction records and seeks individualized assessment and respect for reliance interests.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4234 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for protecting lawful work authorization and avoiding added barriers, citing family self-sufficiency and benefits to employers and the economy.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4684 ↗Oppose tightening · Fears permit expiration will harm family and employment, favoring continued work access.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2505 ↗Oppose tightening · Wants continued work and relief from permit and status renewal difficulties; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity
USCIS-2026-0067-0275 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work and no new barriers, emphasizing family and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0056 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes restrictions on humanitarian parolees’ work and seeks preserved protection and family stability.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4804 ↗Oppose tightening · Argues E-Verify and a uniform discretion framework violate victim confidentiality and seeks reconsideration or exclusion of U-visa applicants.Protection for crime victims · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2809 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-1718 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests relief from processing backlogs and interrupted work; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4454 ↗Oppose tightening · Emphasizes the human and economic harms of limiting lawful employment and favors work access and family stability.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0830 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes permit restrictions and non-conviction arrest presumptions, citing due process and economic harm.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3640 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work and no new barriers, emphasizing family and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2107 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks preserved work permits for humanitarian parolees, arguing restrictions undermine self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Humanitarian protection and safe return
USCIS-2026-0067-0957 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes restrictions on humanitarian parolees’ work and seeks preserved protection and family stability.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3946 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work and no new barriers, emphasizing family and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4779 ↗Oppose tightening · Defends immigrants’ contributions to disability care and asks discretion to consider circumstances they fled, favoring migrant work access.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Humanitarian protection and safe return
USCIS-2026-0067-1329 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges immediate restoration of Ukrainian work permits so people can remain employed and self-sufficient during the war.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity
USCIS-2026-0067-3811 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes heavier requirements and procedures and seeks fair, accessible humanitarian work authorization.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3833 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work and no new barriers, emphasizing family and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1070 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes the proposal, arguing work permit losses harm community sustainability.Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1998 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests relief from processing backlogs and interrupted work; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2892 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work and no new barriers, emphasizing family and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0638 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-3722 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes restrictions on humanitarian parolees’ work and seeks preserved protection and family stability.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-0538 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-1833 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests relief from processing backlogs and interrupted work; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3742 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work and no new barriers, emphasizing family and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1653 ↗Oppose tightening · Emphasizes work as essential to household survival; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2413 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes added economic-necessity, discretion and employer-verification barriers and seeks preserved work for humanitarian parolees.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3259 ↗Oppose tightening · Emphasizes work as essential to household survival; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2803 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0857 ↗Oppose tightening · Supports work opportunities and fair hearings; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-3562 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work authorization without new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0566 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks reasonable work authorization access and no unnecessary delays or barriers from new procedures.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2617 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks that changes not make continued work harder for compliant people with humanitarian protection.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3077 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2241 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal, opposing non-conviction presumptions and universal biometrics burdens, with exemptions as fallback.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity
USCIS-2026-0067-0039 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks fair access and longer permit validity, arguing restrictions harm families and businesses.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3336 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work authorization without new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2554 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks access without new discretionary barriers, E-Verify exemption and continued permits during re-parole waits.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1071 ↗Oppose tightening · Criticizes restrictions as punishing compliant people and creating financial crises, and seeks protected work rights.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1439 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests transparent processing timelines and fee relief; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-1114 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work authorization without new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3464 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work authorization without new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1707 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks reconsideration of work restrictions, arguing they increase poverty, unauthorized employment and business losses.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity
USCIS-2026-0067-3605 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work authorization without new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0856 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes the proposal, calling arrest-record restrictions unfair and harmful to households and the economy.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0227 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks preserved lawful work access to sustain war-affected families’ independence.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2322 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of restrictions on supervision orders, deferred action and parole, citing reliance interests and economic and administrative costs.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers
USCIS-2026-0067-2038 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes added economic-necessity, discretion and employer-verification barriers and seeks preserved work for humanitarian parolees.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1219 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes making work permits harder to obtain, emphasizing lawful workers’ economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1049 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-1573 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks timely work permits to reduce household and employment hardship; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2093 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for rejecting the action, describing affected people as established contributors to society.Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4431 ↗Oppose tightening · Argues threatening permits over arrests without convictions unfairly punishes compliant people and disregards reliance.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3926 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work authorization without new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1337 ↗Oppose tightening · Describes job loss and household pressure from processing delays; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4567 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of humanitarian parole work restrictions, opposing economic necessity, E-Verify and frequent renewals.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0661 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-3678 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work permits without added barriers burdening families and the economy.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1111 ↗Oppose tightening · Condemns treatment of the immigrant community as wrong, directionally opposing restrictions on immigrants.
USCIS-2026-0067-1888 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks a fair and practical permit process so lawfully present people can remain self-sufficient.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3477 ↗Oppose tightening · Emphasizes the importance of safe residence and the right to work for the family, favoring preservation of those opportunities.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2137 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks continued work permit eligibility for Ukrainian parolees, emphasizing employers and community impacts.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributionsAttachments couldn’t be downloaded; classified from the comment text.
USCIS-2026-0067-1928 ↗Oppose tightening · Criticizes the decision as creating unemployment and poverty and losing tax revenue.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-0616 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-1465 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks timely Ukrainian work permit renewals; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributionsAttachments couldn’t be downloaded; classified from the comment text.
USCIS-2026-0067-4757 ↗Oppose tightening · Warns new requirements worsen delays and hardship and seeks accessible humanitarian work permits.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4377 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work permits without added barriers burdening families and the economy.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1758 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks reconsideration of restrictions, arguing short and uncertain permits impede hiring and career development.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2243 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes the proposal and calls for equal and humane treatment.
USCIS-2026-0067-1624 ↗Oppose tightening · Describes household financial hardship from a prolonged inability to work legally and asks for faster EAD processing.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-1305 ↗Oppose tightening · Warns that EAD delays threaten imminent job loss and family income, favoring continued lawful work access.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4137 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work permits without added barriers burdening families and the economy.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3519 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks for continued work authorization for Ukrainians.Humanitarian protection and safe return
USCIS-2026-0067-1914 ↗Oppose tightening · Describes benefits of employment and taxes; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3756 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work permits without added barriers burdening families and the economy.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3437 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal and fewer backlogs, opposing old records continuing to affect employment.Arrest records and individual assessment · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2949 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges full withdrawal, opposing discretion, automatic termination, employer verification and arrest-record barriers.Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Arrest records and individual assessment · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-0476 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks no new lawful-employment barriers, emphasizing self-sufficient households’ taxes and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3970 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks relief from existing renewal backlogs and work interruptions; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2661 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks relief from existing renewal backlogs and work interruptions; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1266 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal or major revision, arguing restrictions harm the economy, worsen backlogs and weaken due process.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-0239 ↗Oppose tightening · Fears the proposal undermines household employment and seeks preserved work opportunities for humanitarian parolees.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2014 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes added discretion, economic-need and job-offer barriers and seeks reliable work permits.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3972 ↗Unclear / unclassifiable direction · The text only says “see attachment,” so no position can be read.Attachments couldn’t be downloaded; classified from the comment text.
USCIS-2026-0067-4781 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes the proposal, arguing economic necessity and E-Verify undermine compliant parolees’ self-sufficiency.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-1818 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks relief from existing renewal backlogs and work interruptions; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1273 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks against adoption, arguing the proposal adds household stress and harms community employment.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Humanitarian protection and safe return
USCIS-2026-0067-3155 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal, arguing the proposal lacks reasoned justification and ignores DACA-related reliance interests.Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0943 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2780 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges full withdrawal, citing commitments to Afghan allies, reliance interests and renewal barriers.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3051 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-3431 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes rigid criminal-history restrictions and seeks consideration of rehabilitation, completed sentences and individual circumstances.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-1683 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests timely Ukrainian parole, TPS and work permit renewals; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0689 ↗Oppose tightening · Criticizes added arbitrary discretion and processing complexity as harmful to immigrant households and the economy.Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-0081 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes the proposal, arguing lawful work supports labor demand, self-sufficiency and humanitarian protection.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Humanitarian protection and safe return
USCIS-2026-0067-3181 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0611 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges full withdrawal, emphasizing commitments to Afghan allies, reliance interests and employment restrictions.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4525 ↗Unclear / unclassifiable direction · The text only says “see attachment,” so no position can be read.Attachments couldn’t be downloaded; classified from the comment text.
USCIS-2026-0067-3218 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected continued work for timely filers and criticizes permit loss caused by government backlogs.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2964 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges full withdrawal, emphasizing commitments to Afghan allies, reliance interests and employment restrictions.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3139 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected work rights and streamlined renewal, warning barriers harm household housing and employers.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0478 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks preserved lawful employment access without new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic benefits.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1306 ↗Oppose tightening · Describes TPS, parole and work permit backlogs; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity
USCIS-2026-0067-2861 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks preserved lawful employment access without new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic benefits.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1287 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes restrictions and delays from the proposal and seeks predictable processing for household stability.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4575 ↗Oppose tightening · Argues restrictions undermine U-visa purposes and crime-reporting cooperation, suggesting renewable four-year permits.Protection for crime victims · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2724 ↗Unclear / unclassifiable direction · Only confirms a form and provides no stance.
USCIS-2026-0067-3205 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks preserved lawful employment access without new barriers, emphasizing self-sufficiency and economic benefits.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-3024 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal or major revision, opposing one-year validity, E-Verify and arrest-record restrictions.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Arrest records and individual assessment · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-4791 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks not to proceed, arguing the proposal creates additional individual difficulties.
USCIS-2026-0067-0885 ↗Support tightening · Explicitly supports the proposal, arguing foreign workers increase competition for domestic jobs.Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2946 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks preserved reliable work permits, arguing restrictions harm compliant households and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0732 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2778 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-1039 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-2641 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks preserved reliable work permits, arguing restrictions harm compliant households and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4775 ↗Oppose tightening · Calls for rejecting rules that limit or delay permits, emphasizing employer and community needs.Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2635 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks preserved reliable work permits, arguing restrictions harm compliant households and economic contributions.Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0332 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal or major revision, arguing protection must include lawful work needed for subsistence.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-1974 ↗Oppose tightening · Favors protecting compliant parolees and employers from unnecessary burdens; accepts scrutiny of serious crime but overall favors preserving work access.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-0013 ↗Oppose tightening · Opposes an economic-necessity barrier as penalizing savings and independence and seeks withdrawal, with a savings exemption as fallback.Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-3905 ↗Oppose tightening · Requests timely Ukrainian work permit renewals; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-2401 ↗Oppose tightening · Explains how a permit would support entrepreneurship and self-sufficiency; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-1806 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks preserved work opportunities for humanitarian parolees, arguing restrictions harm families and employers.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4451 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks not to complicate work permit procedures, to protect livelihoods and continued tax contributions.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4357 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks withdrawal of permit denials based on arrests and unproven charges, citing presumed innocence and livelihoods.Arrest records and individual assessment · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-2664 ↗Oppose tightening · Asks against restricting humanitarian entrants’ work, emphasizing taxes, independence and refuge from war.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0606 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-1847 ↗Oppose tightening · Emphasizes taxes, staffing and reduced assistance from lawful work; directionally favors preserving or improving access to work authorization.Employers, taxes and economic contributions · Livelihood and self-sufficiency
USCIS-2026-0067-0585 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-4746 ↗Oppose tightening · Seeks protected lawful work permits without new barriers, emphasizing family independence during war.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-4049 ↗Oppose tightening · Explicitly opposes restrictions and seeks E-Verify exemptions, automatic extensions and removal of duplicative economic-need documentation.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Employers, taxes and economic contributions
USCIS-2026-0067-0531 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0790 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
USCIS-2026-0067-0636 ↗Oppose tightening · Urges withdrawal of the entire proposal, arguing that discretion, annual renewals and employer verification barriers harm Afghan allies and disregard reliance interests.Humanitarian protection and safe return · Livelihood and self-sufficiency · Renewals, backlogs and work continuity · E-Verify and self-employment barriers · Discretion, procedure and reliance interests
This is the spread across a random sample. People choose to write in, and some comments come from organized campaigns.
Distribution of views
Published comments: 4,804 · Sampled 09/12/2026, 09:09 ET
Comment period closed 2026-08-04 · Sample retained for review
This sample covers comments on the full proposed rule, including criminal-record review and work authorization for parole, deferred action and supervision orders. Labels describe the related work-authorization policy direction; clear calls to preserve, restore or facilitate lawful work count as opposition to tightening.
Policy direction
Classified by policy direction: support includes endorsing the proposal, clearly negative views of the relevant foreign-worker or visa program, and calls for tighter restrictions. Opposition includes rejecting restrictions, defending migrants or work authorization, and preserving or expanding access. Explicit views on the proposal’s exact provisions are not required.
Themes discussed
Supporters and opponents may discuss the same theme. A comment can have multiple labels; percentages use the selected group’s comment count, so totals may exceed 100%.
All: 200 comments · Percentages within this group
Sampling method & all 200 records
A fixed random seed selected 200 unique comment IDs from the complete listing of 4804 published records. Sampled 09/12/2026, 09:09 ET. This site's AI classified each body into one position and zero or more themes; these are not official labels. Similar submissions with distinct IDs remain separate records.
Each full body is reviewed for its relevant policy direction, rather than classified by isolated words such as support or oppose. Demands for higher fees, tighter restrictions or visa abolition count as support for tightening; preserving or expanding work and residence opportunities counts as opposition. Scope-dependent combinations of tightening and easing, or explicit substantive conditions of support, remain conditional / mixed. Opposing the removal of protections while accepting shorter protections only as a fallback remains opposition. General anti-fraud language does not override an overall defense of lawful work access. Unrelated content, pure questions, indeterminate views and unreadable records remain unclear. Labels rely on the text, not names or identities. Unavailable attachments are disclosed and only readable bodies are assessed. No sample is replaced because of its viewpoint or readability.
Download sampling frame, seed & classifications (JSON)All: 200 comments
This is the spread across a random sample. People choose to write in, and some comments come from organized campaigns.
Read published comments on Regulations.gov ↗