U.S. Stay Path Policy Radar
14 policy developments · 78 school/department records
8 more policies
Key dates in the next 30 days
Highest-impact barriers
Ranked by potential impact on the stay path, #01 highest · Colors mark the path stage
Proposed OPT Fees: $70,000 Initially, $30,000 Subsequently
The first step of applying for OPT is a “recommendation” your school’s DSO enters in SEVIS. ICE proposes that before that recommendation, the school must pay the government a fee for each student: $70,000 the first time and $30,000 for each later OPT (including a STEM extension). The school can pay it or pass it to the student or employer. Comments close November 9; it is not in effect, and OPT applications continue as usual. Submit a public comment ↗
The fee rule (RIN 1653-AB01) went to OIRA for review.
OIRA finished review and cleared the proposal with changes.
The proposal was published: schools pay $70,000 first and $30,000 each time after; rule comments close November 9, comments on forms and data collection (PRA) December 7.
Proposal published; public comments open
Public comments on the rule close; online comments must be in by 11:59 p.m. Eastern Time.
Comments on the forms and data collection (PRA) close.
The final rule and its start date; fees begin 60 days after the final rule is published.
Proposed $103,265 H-1B Surcharge
DHS proposes that for every H-1B petition that goes through the lottery (cap-subject), the employer pays an extra $103,265 on top of existing fees. That includes U.S. master’s-cap cases and F-1 students switching straight from OPT to H-1B inside the U.S.; petitions from cap-exempt employers such as universities do not pay. Comments closed in September and there is no final rule, so nothing is charged now.
DHS published the $103,265 surcharge proposal.
The Federal Register published a correction to the historical filing counts in one table; amount, scope and deadline unchanged.
Public comments closed.
Separate $100,000 entry fee: in Global Nurse Force the court struck down the collection policy and barred collection under both proclamations.
$100,000 fee case: the government appealed to the Ninth Circuit and asked the district court to pause the case.
$100,000 fee case: the Ninth Circuit set the government’s opening brief for November 6 and plaintiffs’ answer for December 4.
$100,000 fee case: the district court refused to pause the case and ordered the government to turn over its administrative record.
Comment period closed; awaiting DHS’s final decision
$100,000 fee case: government’s opening brief due in the Ninth Circuit.
$100,000 fee case: plaintiffs’ answering brief due.
After reviewing public comments, DHS decides the final text and start date of the $103,265 surcharge.
Court Stays the D/S Final Rule Nationwide
D/S (duration of status) is how F-1 students stay today: as long as you keep studying by the rules, you can stay lawfully, with no fixed end date on your I-94. DHS’s July final rule would replace that with a fixed period and a separate extension filing when it runs out. On September 14 a court paused the rule nationwide, so nothing has changed. The case continues: both sides have asked the court to rule on the written record and filed responses on November 2; the government has also appealed, with its appellate brief due November 9.
- Lawsuit filed
- Government opposes
- Hearing; no ruling yet
- Nationwide stay
- Both sides seek judgment
- Government reply filed
DHS published the proposed rule.
DHS published the final rule.
A coalition of universities and other plaintiffs filed suit in federal court in Massachusetts.
The government filed its opposition, asking the court not to pause the rule.
The court heard arguments and did not rule from the bench.
The court issued a preliminary injunction postponing the entire rule nationwide and barring enforcement.
Lawmakers introduced resolutions to overturn the rule (S.J.Res.213 in the Senate, H.J.Res.215 in the House).
S.J.Res.213 was placed on the Senate calendar (No. 668).
DHS/ICE and others appealed to the First Circuit (No. 26-2112); the pause stays in place.
Status conference held; the court asked both sides for next-step proposals by October 9.
Both sides filed proposals: the government asked to pause the district case until the appeal is decided; plaintiffs objected and asked for a quick ruling striking down the rule.
The court set a schedule: administrative record by October 23, judgment requests by October 26, replies by November 2.
The First Circuit set the government’s brief and appendix for November 9.
The court moved judgment requests to October 30 and kept replies due November 2; the government turned over the administrative record.
Both sides asked the court to decide the case on the written record.
The government filed its final reply asking to win; as a fallback, it asks to send the rule back to DHS while keeping it, and to narrow who is protected.
Plaintiffs responded to the government, challenged the cost-benefit analysis, SEVIS alternatives and public-comment process, and asked the court to strike down the whole rule.
The government filed an index and excerpts of the administrative record cited in its earlier request for judgment.
Nationwide stay; both sides filed November 2 responses, ruling pending
Government’s brief and appendix due in the First Circuit.
The district court rules on both sides’ requests for judgment; plaintiffs’ appellate answer is due 30 days after they receive the government’s brief.
H-1B Selection Now Weights Wage Levels
The H-1B lottery no longer gives everyone the same odds. It now depends on the wage level of your offer: Level I (entry) is entered once, Level II twice, Level III three times and Level IV (senior) four times. More entries mean a better chance of being picked. The rule took effect February 27, 2026 and applies from the FY 2027 lottery (held in spring 2026).
DHS proposed the wage-weighted lottery.
DHS published the final rule, keeping 1 to 4 entries for Levels I to IV.
The rule took effect and was used for the FY 2027 H-1B lottery.
Final rule in effect
The next lottery will also be weighted by wage level.
Tighter CPT Guidance: An Elective Internship Course Is No Longer Enough
In August, ICE/SEVP sent schools two notices tightening CPT: CPT can be approved only for an internship every student in the program must complete to graduate, an elective internship course usually does not count, and the employer must sign a cooperative agreement with the school. Many schools have paused or narrowed CPT as a result. Four higher-education associations sued to pause the guidance and replied to the government on November 4. The judge heard both sides on November 6 and will decide later whether to pause the guidance. Until the court rules, the guidance applies.
- Lawsuit; pause requested
- Government opposes
- Reply allowed
- Plaintiffs replied
- Hearing held; ruling pending
SEVP Broadcast 2608-01: CPT must be indispensable to the degree and required of every student; DSOs and schools are responsible.
Several schools paused elective (course-credit or optional) CPT, or approved only degree-required internships.
Broadcast 2608-02 explained more about electives, “all students” and cooperative agreements.
Four associations sued (AAU v. DHS) and asked the court to pause the guidance.
Plaintiffs filed their arguments for pausing the guidance.
The court set a hearing for November 6.
The court gave the government until October 28 to respond.
The government opposed, arguing the plaintiffs lack standing and the notices cannot be reviewed by a court.
Plaintiffs asked to file a reply by November 4.
The court allowed plaintiffs’ reply.
Plaintiffs filed their reply seeking a pause of the notices and a bar on enforcing the new interpretation; the court allowed registered public telephone access to the November 6 hearing.
The judge heard both sides on pausing the guidance and decided to rule later.
Guidance in use; November 6 hearing held, ruling pending
The court decides whether to pause the two CPT notices while the case proceeds.
After the ruling, schools adjust CPT approvals to the ruling and their curricula.
Proposed Increase to H-1B / PERM Wage Floors
When an employer sponsors you for H-1B or a PERM green card, your pay cannot fall below a minimum set by the Department of Labor (DOL). DOL proposes raising that minimum sharply: for entry-level jobs, from “more than about 17% of people in the same job and area earn” to “more than about 34%,” with the other three levels rising too. On November 6, DOL sent the draft final rule to the White House’s OIRA for review before publication. Current wage levels continue to apply.
A presidential proclamation told DOL to start revising H-1B wage levels.
DOL published the proposal: four levels at the 34th, 52nd, 70th and 88th percentiles.
The 60-day public comment period closed and DOL began reviewing comments.
DOL sent the wage final rule to OIRA for review before publication.
Final rule at OIRA; review before publication pending
OIRA completes final-rule review; DOL then publishes the final text, transition arrangements and effective date.
New wage levels apply only once a final rule is published and its start date arrives.
H-1B Reform: Cap-Exempt Status and Client-Site Jobs Under Review
DHS plans three changes: redefine which employers can skip the H-1B lottery (cap-exempt, such as universities and affiliated research institutes); look harder at employers with past violations; and look harder at jobs where workers are placed at a client company. The proposal is at OIRA, the White House office that reviews rules before publication. Its text is not public yet, and current H-1B rules still apply.
DHS described the reform in its rulemaking plan.
The proposal went to OIRA for review.
Under OIRA review
OIRA finishes review and DHS publishes the full proposal.
Once published, the proposal opens for public comment before any final rule.
Proposed End to the Up-to-60-Day Grace Period After Job Loss
Today, if an H-1B or other work-visa holder is laid off or quits, they can stay in the U.S. lawfully for up to 60 more days to find a new employer, change status or arrange to leave. DHS proposes ending that grace period. Comments close November 10, and if you lose your job now you still get the 60 days. The F-1 grace period after graduation is a separate rule and not part of this proposal. Submit a public comment ↗
The proposal went to OIRA for review.
OIRA finished review and cleared the proposal with changes.
The proposal was posted for public inspection in the Federal Register, listing eight work-visa categories and their families.
The proposal was published; public comments close November 10.
Proposal published; public comments open
Public comments due before midnight Eastern Time, filed on regulations.gov under docket USCIS-2026-0364.
After reviewing comments, DHS decides on a final rule and its start date.
Automatic Extensions Removed for Certain EAD Renewals
If you work on an EAD (work permit) and filed your renewal on or after October 30, 2025, you have to stop working when the old card expires and wait for the new one. Before, filing a renewal kept the old card valid for a while longer (up to 540 days); that cushion is gone. The October 14 final rule makes this permanent, with the same cutoff date. A September 11 court order protects only the seven people who sued. The court moved the hearing on the government’s request to end the case to November 16.
- Relief for seven plaintiffs
- Lawsuit hearing
The interim rule was published and took effect, drawing the line by renewal filing date.
Public comments on the interim rule closed.
Jane Doe preliminary injunction entered (signed September 10), protecting the seven people who sued.
The final rule was posted for public inspection in the Federal Register, keeping the 2025 interim rule unchanged.
The final rule was published and took effect the same day (91 FR 65306); the October 30, 2025 cutoff is unchanged.
The court asked both sides whether the October 14 final rule left a dispute for it to decide.
The court moved the hearing on the government’s request to end the case and the scheduling conference to November 16.
Rule in force; hearing November 16 on the request to end the case
Hearing on the government’s request to end the case and scheduling conference, 4 p.m. Pacific / 7 p.m. Eastern.
Further USCIS instructions and later orders in the Jane Doe case.
Proposed Expansion of Criminal-Record Review for Form I-765
DHS proposes that for most work permits, including OPT and H-4 EAD, USCIS would generally deny Form I-765 if the applicant has ever been arrested, criminally charged, indicted or convicted, unless there is a strong public-interest reason to approve. People without a criminal record are not affected. Comments closed in August; there is no final rule yet, so current standards still apply.
OIRA finished reviewing the proposal.
DHS published the proposal.
The 60-day public comment period closed.
Comments closed; awaiting a final rule
DHS reviews public comments and decides whether to revise or finalize.
If finalized, the new standard applies to first-time and renewal applications from its start date.
Proposed End to Work Authorization for Some H-4 Spouses
Spouses of H-1B workers hold H-4 status, which does not allow work on its own. Since 2015, if the H-1B holder is on the green-card path (for example, an approved I-140), the spouse can apply for an EAD (work permit). DHS plans to end that eligibility. The H-1B holder is not affected. For now it is only on the government’s long-term plan, with no proposal, and the current rule still applies.
Listed as a long-term item in the government’s rulemaking plan.
Long-term plan; no date
If DHS moves ahead, it must publish a proposal, take public comments and then issue a final rule; lawsuits could follow.
PERM Reform: How Employers Recruit and Comply
PERM is the first step of an employer-sponsored green card: the employer has to advertise the job and show it couldn’t find a qualified U.S. worker. DOL plans to overhaul that step, covering how employers recruit, protections for laid-off U.S. workers and compliance rules. The White House’s OIRA finished its review on October 23 and cleared it with changes. Next, DOL publishes the formal proposal; for now the old rules apply.
DOL listed PERM reform in the government’s rulemaking plan, aiming to publish a proposal in July.
DOJ settled with OpenAI over PERM, requiring it to post jobs on its own site and accept online applications.
The proposal went to the White House’s OIRA for review.
OIRA finished review and cleared the proposal once changes are made (Consistent with Change).
OIRA done; awaiting proposal
DOL publishes the formal proposal, with recruiting channels, which cases it covers and a public comment deadline.
The final rule, its start date and transition terms for pending cases.
H-1B Executive Order: Employer Layoffs Become Part of Review
A September 18 executive order tells the State Department, the Department of Labor and DHS to share information when reviewing H-1B cases, and to consider the sponsoring employer’s recent relevant layoffs. “Relevant” means all three: the same employer, similar jobs, and within the past year or already planned. You are most likely to be asked about it at the visa interview or at the border. Layoffs are one factor in the review, and the reviewing officer weighs them case by case. DOL will also re-check employers’ past LCAs.
The President signed the order: agencies coordinate, consider relevant layoffs and re-check past LCAs.
Published in the Federal Register as Executive Order 14431 (91 FR 60501–60503).
Related PERM action: at a White House press conference, a DOL official announced a suspension of new and pending PERM cases for named companies including Microsoft and Adobe.
DOJ announced the Cloudera settlement: no PERM filings for 24 months from its latest withdrawal.
Signed; agencies implementing
DOL starts re-checking past LCAs (due to begin by October 18), and agencies issue their implementing documents.
Proposed End to Deference to Prior Approvals in Work-Visa Renewals
When the first three years of an H-1B run out, the employer files another I-129 to extend it. Today, if the employer, worker and job are the same, USCIS generally follows its earlier approval instead of starting over. DHS proposes ending that, so every extension can be reviewed from scratch. The proposal was published October 14 and comments close November 13. It is not in effect; extensions work as before for now. Submit a public comment ↗
The proposal was posted for public inspection in the Federal Register, proposing to delete 8 CFR 214.1(c)(5).
The proposal was published (91 FR 65119); comments close November 13.
Proposal published; public comments open
Public comments due before midnight Eastern Time, filed on regulations.gov under docket USCIS-2026-0529.
After reviewing comments, DHS decides the final text and start date.
CPT: Which schools have paused approvals?
Most pauses concern elective or course-credit CPT, not every form of CPT.